How Bitcoin became Zionist Bitcoin
From the formation of Israel in 1948 to the technocratic kleptocracy/dystopian plutocracy of present day
Author’s note: This articles serves as a refreshment to the somewhat ranting piece of my first Substack article “Bitcoin becomes Zionist Bitcoin”. To anyone who is still mystified and puzzled as to how an extreme ideology, Zionism, fits with the “decentralized” blockchain known as Bitcoin…right here, I will lay out how the advancement of Zionism over the decades has also coincided with the advancement of technology from the U.S. and Western allied nations, namely cryptographers. -Golden Monarch
Since 2008’s aftermath of the U.S.’s financial crisis, businesses (small ones mainly) felt an economic ripple, home owners suddenly lost their homes and defaulted their loans, and former President Barick Obama worked for the banks to ultimately get the federal government to bail out the banks’ colossal mishandling of its expansion of mortgages to high-risk borrowers. And during that time, the “deep state” within the federal government, along with the developer(s) under the alias “Satoshi Nakomoto”, released a “decentralized” blockchain known as Bitcoin, said to be a peer-to peer electronic cash system. While this was happening in the U.S., Israel launched its first Gaza war between 2008-2009, telling U.S. officials that Israel would keep Gaza's economy "on the brink of collapse".
At first glance, these two events appeared separate from one another; what if that was not the case, and in fact, they were deeply connected to one another. To tackle how advanced technology such as Bitcoin inevitably played its role to strengthen Israel and Zionist values, we must first rewind back to how Israel existed in the first place. Following that, we will look through the eyes of five particular cryptographers, specialists who created/analyzed/broke codes, whose involvement inadvertently (and perhaps deliberately) contributed to the strengthening of technology and Zionism for the establishment likes of Wall Street, financial institutions, crypto industry, military industrial complex, etc.
Creation of the CIA: 1947
In response to growing tensions with the Soviet Union after World War II, former President Harry S. Truman signed the National Security Act into law on July 26, 1947. And on that same day, the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) was born, which grew out of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), a wartime agency originally intended to be temporary. But due to demands from within the agency who wanted to deal with tensions from the Soviet Union, the CIA became more than what Truman originally thought the CIA was set out to be - a daily newspaper.
Truman underestimated the CIA, the U.S.’s first civilian intelligence agency whose goal was to collect secret information for policy makers. As the CIA grew among establishments, its role in a transparent democracy raised unending questions, such as assisting with the controversial birth of Israel.
Creation of Israel: 1948
The CIA provided a new territory for Jewish settlement, ironically at an already occupied civilization: Palestine. Since 1907, the Jewish Agency, an operational branch of the Zionist Organization (ZO), along with the League of Nations were hellbent to represent Jewish interests including the security of a national homeland. On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. On that same day, Truman recognized the State of Israel.
As Israel was formed, the CIA was also involved with the "Joint", an international Jewish organization that was founded by the American secret service. With the creation of Zionist agents, the "Joint" was intended to assist Jews in other countries; in reality though, it was involved in espionage, terrorism, and other subversive activities. The CIA also cooperated with Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency. Throughout existence, Mossad had specialized on foreign intelligence gathering, intelligence analysis, and covert operations. Along with the CIA, Mossad adopted varieties of technologies to counter resistance. There also were interests from the United Nations (UN) to partition the British mandate of Palestine into both a Jewish and an Arab state, of which hostilities broke out due to the meddling of Western power. Point being, Western agencies and interests collided together to ensuring Israel would be established for generations to come (which has only gotten worse through the ideology of Zionism).
Creation of the NSA: 1952
U.S. Security Cooperation with Israel
Cryptology’s Role in the Early Development of Computer Capabilities in the United States
To assist the CIA and other Western-affiliated agencies around the world, the Air Force Security Agency (AFSA), having failed to achieve its goals to centralize communications intelligence and coordination with civilian agencies that had shared its interests, was remodeled as the National Security Agency (NSA). Under the orders of Truman, U.S. and Israel signed a Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement, ensuring that the U.S. would provide steadfast economic support for Israel. While the U.S. and Israel grew stronger together, the NSA meanwhile invested in technology to boost the U.S.’s military capabilities, including that of supercomputers. Over the decades, the NSA observed and attempted to recruit and/or blend amongst cryptographers.
The Rise (& Zionists’ eventual exploitation) of Cypherpunks
Cypherpunk Forefather David Chaum, On His Thoughts And Plans For 2019
Pioneers of Modern Cryptography
Later Cypherpunks and Crypto-Anarchists
Cypherpunk Forefather David Chaum, On His Thoughts And Plans For 2019
The NSA paid close attention to computer scientists who became part of a larger movement to expand cryptography ("hidden, secret"; "to write" or "to study") known as Cypherpunk. Cypherpunks advocated for the widespread application of robust cryptography and privacy-enhancing technology, with the first work of public-key cryptography coming from the hands of Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman. Other pioneers of the early Cypherpunk movement include Clifford Cocks (who secretly worked in secrecy for intelligence agencies), Ralph C. Merkle (inventor of hash), and even the ideological forefather of the Cypherpunk movement, David Chaum.
David Chaum
Chaum was born to a Jewish family in 1955. Not surprisingly, Chaum was unaware of how Israel for decades has benefited greatly from the US. In the 2019 Bitcoin Summit at Israel, Chaum stated the following:
“It's been 50 years since I was last in Israel, and it's refreshing to see the explosion in community, talent, and innovation focused on the blockchain industry here.”
“Israel is a key market in blockchain's growth and development, and I'm excited to see the many intriguing use-cases for blockchain which will emerge from Israel in the future."
Chaum was hyper focused on Bitcoin and projects involving Bitcoin, to the point where he was oblivious to international war crimes of which Israel had repeatedly violated. Chaum also has a lack of awareness to the growing number of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank who for generations have suffered under Zionist tyranny and its IDF (Israel Defense Forces).
The 90s
From the 90s and onward, more prominent cypherpunks emerged, ranging from Julian Assange (Wikileaks founder and journalist) to Adam Back (Inventor of HashCash, CEO of Blockstream) to Hal Finney (who is heavily theorized to be “Satoshi Nakamoto”, who created Bitcoin) to most particularly Timothy C. May (writer of the Crypto-Anarchist Manifesto and the Cyphernomicon). Later in this section, focus will predominately cover May’s contributions due to his cynical nature and controversial statement regarding Martin Luther King Jr.
Modern day cypherpunks (and criticism about it)
In present time, cypherpunks that most crypto communities know about include Bram Cohen (creator of BitTorrent), Edward Snowden (NSA whistleblower), Peter Todd (A Zionist who loudly supports both Ukraine and Israel, Bitcoin Core Developer/ contributor to the The Bitcoin Lightning Network), and Ross Ulbricht (Founder of the Silk Road dark web). The common traits among these cypherpunks are their interest to use technology to empower individuals and create a more open and secure digital space. While cypherpunks believe what they are doing is noble and for the greater good, they do not directly address nor assist in the fundamental needs of citizens (universal health, proper infrastructure, reparations, abolishing the military and Wall Street, etc.)
As much as cypherpunks desire to separate themselves from government, how are they supposed to do that? Advanced technology such as computers and coding originate from US military and advanced departments, known as “Projects”. Cypherpunks claim they want liberate society from the government but how can they when their ideology are strongly Libertarian-based, which is the belief of a small government tied to a free market model. And how about the inseparable connections between cypherpunks and the NSA? The NSA is deeply interested in cypherpunk projects; they have stepped in whenever a cypherpunk reveals too much information to the public, such as leaks coming out of Assange and Snowden.
Timothy C. May
“Computer technology is on the verge of providing the ability for individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each other in a totally anonymous manner.” -Timothy C. May
May played a huge role in cryptography and crypto anarchy prior to his death in December 2018. As the writer of the Crypto-Anarchist Manifesto and the Cyphernomicon, May did not hide his abhorrent feature of blatant racism, particularly towards Blacks and Jews. Viewer discretion, May’s full statement about Martin Luther King Jr. is found in the link above. A snippet of May’s commentary is posted right below.
"I have a dream!," his call for the colored to rise up, was little
different from the "Visions of a hamburger" of the current derelicts
and deadbeats on Pacific.” - Timothy C. May
“Liquidate the Jew and the negro and most of our problems fade away.” - Timothy C. May
May is as racist as the white supremist ideology of Zionism, which have stemmed from Israeli Zionists, especially Christian Zionists from the U.S. How does one look past May’s racist tendencies?
In the Cyphernomicon, May discussed opening statements about Cypherpunks and the NSA. According to May, he never directly worked for the NSA, but he did previous work for the hardware company Intel, a company which has its own history of business contracts and research with Israel and China.
Listed below are some of May’s statements that reveal (at least in May’s opinion) the agenda of most if not all cypherpunks, which has been largely carried out by the time Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency came into existence. (Note: the terms “Bitcoin” and “cryptocurrency” are never stated; they are heavily implied however via its predecessors “Electronic Cash”/”Digital Cash”.)
1. Introduction
1.2. Foreword
+ Focus of this FAQ is U.S.-centric, for various reasons
- most on list are in U.S., and I am in U.S.
- NSA and crypto community is largely centered in the U.S.,
with some strong European activities
- U.S. law is likely to influence overseas law
1.2. Foreword (continued)
- The list has a lot of radical libertarians, some anarcho-capitalists, and even a few socialists
- Mostly computer-related folks, as might be expected. (There are some political scientists, classical scholars, etc. Even a few current or ex-lawyers.)
2.10. Surveillance and Privacy
2.10.1. "Does the NSA monitor this list?"
- Probably. We've been visible enough, and there are many
avenues for monitoring or even subscribing to the List.
Many aliases, many points of presence.
- some concerns that Cypherpunks list has been infiltrated
and is a "round up list"
- There have even been anonymous messages purporting to name
likely CIA, DIA, and NSA spooks. ("Be aware.")
- Remember, the list of subscribers is _not_ a secret--it can
be gotten by sending a "who cypherpunks" message to
majordomo@toad.com. Anyone in the world can do this.
2.13.4. "What effect will crypto have on governments?"
- A huge topic, one I've been thinking about since late 1987
when it dawned on me that public key crypto and anonymous
digital cash systems, information markets, etc. meant the
end of governments as we know them. (I called this
development "crypto anarchy." Not everyone is a fan of it.
But it's coming, and fast.)
- "Putting the NSA out of business," as the NYT article put it
4. Goals and Ideology -- Privacy, Freedom, New Approaches
4.3.2. People should not expect a uniform ideology on this list. Some of us are anarcho-capitalist radicals (or "crypto anarchists"), others of us are staid Republicans, and still others are Wobblies and other assored leftists.
5. Cryptology (the study of codes, creating and solving them)
5.4.8. When did modern cryptology start? + "What are some of the modern applications of cryptology?" + "Zero Knowledge Interactive Proof Systems" (ZKIPS) - since around 1985 - "minimum disclosure proofs" + proving that you know something without actually revealing that something + practical example: password
6. The Need For Strong Crypto
6.7.3. Crypto anarchy means prosperity for those who can grab it, those competent enough to have something of value to offer for sale; the clueless 95% will suffer, but that is only just. With crypto anarchy we can painlessly, without initiation of aggression, dispose of the nonproductive, the halt and the lame. (Charity is always possible, but I suspect even the liberal do-gooders will throw up their hands at the prospect of a nation of mostly unskilled and essentially illiterate and innumerate workers being unable to get meaningful, well-paying jobs.)
8. Anonymity, Digital Mixes, and Remailers
8.3.2. What's the difference between anonymity and pseudonymity?
+ Not much, at one level...we often use the term "digital pseudonym" in a strong sense, in which the actual identity cannot be deduced easily
- this is "anonymity" in a certain sense
8.4. Reasons for Anonymity and Digital Pseudonyms (and Untraceable E- Mail)
Privacy in general, Physical threats, Voting, Maintenance of Free Speech, etc.
10.10. Export of Crypto, ITAR, and Similar Laws
10.8. Legal Issues with Digital Cash 10.8.1. "What's the legal status of digital cash?" - It hasn't been tested, like a lot of crypto protocols. It may be many years before these systems are tested. 10.8.2. "Is there a tie between digital cash and money laundering?" - There doesn't have to be, but many of us believe the widespread deployment of digital, untraceable cash will make possible new approaches - Hence the importance of digital cash for crypto anarchy and related ideas. - (In case it isn't obvious, I consider money-laundering a non-crime.)
10.10.4. Why and How Crypto is Not the Same as Armaments
- the gun comparison has advantages and disadvantages
- "right to keep and bear arms"
- but then this opens the door wide to restrictions,
regulations, comparisons of crypto to nuclear weapons, etc.
+ "Crypto is not capable of killing people directly. Crypto
consists entirely of information (speech, if you must) that cannot
be interdicted. Crypto has civilian use.
12. Digital Cash and Net Commerce
12.3.5. The digital cash discussions get similarly confused by the various ideas about money. Digital cash is not necessarily a form of _currency_, but is instead a transfer mechanism. More like a "digital check," in fact (though it may give rise to new currencies, or to wider use of some existing currency...at some point, it may become indistinguishable from a currency).
Wei Dai
What is B-money, and how did it pave the way for Bitcoin?
Cypherpunks Write Code: Wei Dai and B-money — or a Coin Before Bitcoin
The third Cypherpunk to briefly discuss here is Wei Dai, who theoretically created a cryptocurrency before Bitcoin. Dai proposed B-money, which was said to be a currency to be managed by users while retaining principles of “decentralization” and anonymity. Much like Bitcoin, B-money would have required computational work to perform and facilitate transactions. Unlike Bitcoin though, Dai never defined a fixed supply limit, as in how many total B-money could exist overall. Even “Satoshi Nakamoto” credited Dai for the inspiration that would become Bitcoin.
“I didn’t create Bitcoin but only described a similar idea more than a decade ago. And my understanding is that the creator of Bitcoin, who goes by the name Satoshi Nakamoto, didn’t even read my article before reinventing the idea himself. He learned about it afterward and credited me in his paper. So my connection with the project is quite limited.” -Wei Dai
Dai, for the all the theoretical accomplishments he achieved, never realized his concept(s) would be used and further exploited by capitalists including financial institutions and banks who could financially afford to expand upon what he and “Satoshi” sought out. Dai at least figured out that Elon Musk was tweeting just for political effect.
Universal Electronic Cash
Is "Satoshi Nakamoto" cryogenically frozen?
Thus far, we have delved into the Cypherpunk mindsets of Chaum, May, and Wei. Each have varying opinions but what all three have not realized, despite their meticulous intellect of computer science, is that all three have advocated for/been misguided into the mindset of “free market”, which defaults to keep capitalism around.
Hal Finney, heavily thought to be “Satoshi Nakamoto”, is one such individual who may have craved capitalism to continue exist. Finney is cryogenically frozen under the care of Alcor Life Extension Foundation. More information about Finney and Alcor can be found in the link above. Another individual was briefly mentioned in said article: Tatsuaki Okamoto. Let us discuss how Okamoto’s contribution to electronic cash also paved way for corporate greed and politics.
Universal Electronic Cash (PDF)
Oracle started as a CIA project (2014)
On two Reddit posts, Okamoto is heavily implied to “Satoshi” based on the following traits:
-moto (本) is a ridiculously common element in a Japanese name
Proficient in C++
Real direct proof, Running on Karma–P2P Reputation and Currency Systems (2007)
Committee Chairman was Okamoto
Anonymity for a long time afterward: propaganda, one of the best weapons governments have against their subjects.
NSA paper, 1996: "How To Make A Mint: The Cryptography of Anonymous Electronic Cash" (See article about Hal Finney/"Satoshi Nakamoto”)
Notably, Okamoto’s Universal Electronic Cash suggests cash and physical properties such as bills and coins will not become as secure as electronic wallets, which would store electronic cash. This is what Okamoto’s introduction states:
Electronic cash is one of the most important application of modern cryptology because an electronic money (cash) system will be widely installed in the near future; smart cards will become electronic wallets storing electronic cash. The security of real cash heavily depends on physical properties such as the difficulty of reproducing bills and coins. The security of electronic cash systems cannot depend on any physical condition, but must be guaranteed by mathematics.
Next, Okamoto describes the criteria of an ideal cash system: independence, security, privacy (untraceability), off-line payment, transferability, dividability. Out of the five criterias, privacy/transferability/dividability formed advanced electronic cash to where the system would be independent of any one users or bank of handling transferability, dividability (One issued piece of cash worth value C [dollars] can be subdivided into many pieces such that each subdivided piece is worthy any desire value less than C and the total value of all pieces is equivalent to C…), and keep said privacy of user’s account and even transaction anonymous from one another, even potentially a central bank. The description above sounds like a pre-design to what would become Bitcoin along with eventual inclusions of online banking and crypto exchanges.
As of present, Okamoto is the Director of Cryptography and Information Security Laboratory and NTT Fellow at NTT Research Inc.. NTT is a Silicon Valley-based startup dedicated to conducting fundamental research in the fields of physics, cryptography and medical informatics. NTT is also partnered with another organization to strengthen cloud capabilities: that being Oracle, which itself has a history of originating from the CIA, which has direct ties to the NSA. This is a major red flag; is Okamoto involved in any of this, and if so, what is Okamoto aware of?
Shamir Adi
FAS Cryptographer Adi Shamir Prevented from Attending NSA History Conference
RSA Conference 2019: Cryptographers’ Panel Decries Adi Shamir’s Visa Issues
The fifth and final cryptographer (who like Okamoto, not identified as a cypherpunk) to discuss is one of irony. Meet Shamir Adi, an Israeli cryptographer and co-inventor the RSA Algorithm, one of the oldest public-key cryptosystem based on factorization of large number and modular arithmetic for encrypting and decrypting data. There are three main stages to RSA:
Key generation
Encryption
Decryption
(More detailed information about RSA is found above.)
Shamir was prohibited at least twice from attention significant conferences related to technology. In 2013, Shamir faced difficulty getting a visa to attend the NSA’s 2013 Cryptologic History Symposium. According to Shamir, the U.S. bureaucracy was very difficult despite Shamir’s submissions of papers being formally accepted. Other foreign scientists were facing a similar situation to Shamir:
In my humble opinion, we are heading toward a disaster, and I have heard many people, among them our top scientists, saying that they are not willing anymore to visit the US, and collaborate with American scientists, because of the difficulties. It is clear that scientists have been singled out, since I hear that other ‘simple citizen’, do get their visa in a short time.” - Adi Shamir
Near the end of Shamir’s letter to colleagues, he was re-invited. But Shamir already committed to another visit, to MIT. Shamir also scolded the U.S.’s irresponsibility to alienate foreign scientists’ visas, suggesting scientists would have better cooperation with European and Chinese scientists.
Shamir, despite coming from a privileged Israeli status, ran into the same problem: being denied a visa prior to wanting to participate at the 2019 RSA Conference in San Francisco, CA. (And maybe this was one conference was worth missing because one of the panelists, Tal Rabin, who for years worked for IBM, Algorand Foundation, and presently Amazon Web Services, went on to say this:)
“As a community of cryptographers we have the tools to protect privacy of data by requiring processors follow rules,” Rabin said. “So it’s important to realize our responsibility is not just to be motivated by profit, but some sort of social responsibility.” -Tal Rabin
Much like the NSA’s conference, Shamir felt researchers needed to rethink where else to hold conferences if not the U.S.
The U.S. is very deceptive and choosy about who/what to promote and who/what to keep in the background. Perhaps Shamir, cryptographers, and much of the cypherpunk movement felt they were greatly exploited while being greatly appreciated by mainstream brands of technology and research. As long as the U.S. remains home to Silicon Valley to Big Tech to Wall Street to the Crypto Industry, in an ironic sense, from Chaum to May to Wei to Okamoto to even Shamir, all these “respected” individuals are still playing the unspoken rule of capitalism: there are winners and there are losers by design (even within technology).
Exposing The Government's Secret Crypto Scam | Rigged From The Start
Before wrapping up, upon recommendation of good friend “Dr. Nick Riviera”, one video worth dissecting as far as understanding the already convoluted arguments of what cryptographers (& cypherpunks) made for crypto and “electronic cash”, is to hear what Jimmy Vallee recently said about the government’s crypto scam. Vallee, despite being a manager director who runs his own business Valhil Capital, LLC, laid out how crypto including Bitcoin has always been a scam, a “rug pull” of sorts where only a small minority of whales control the overall value of said cryptocurrency. Bitcoin requires an enormous amount of computing power to solving problem for the sake of mining, to generate and verify new transactions. Vallee warned about the federal government and central banks being ready to go cashless sometime in 2025.
Point being, the U.S. and its Western allies have taken the best implementations of technology, including blockchain, to primarily benefit the rich. The stubborn perseverance of cryptographers’ & cypherpunks’ works, and their dubious relations with three letter agencies (CIA, NSA, etc.) as far back as 1948-1952, have been to prioritize U.S. interests with Israel and its ideology among Christians and Israelis, Zionism. When Bitcoin was carefully put out into the public post-2008 financial crisis, the “deep state” had already motioned Bitcoin to be found, to be monitored via its first influencers, to be studied, and ultimately to be used as the greatest tool of deceit, control and influence by the hands of Zionist capitalists. Hence, how Bitcoin became Zionist Bitcoin.
#FreePalestine 🇵🇸 #FuckBitcoin
fwiw hal finney's wife said paul le roux is satoshi https://cryptadamus.substack.com/p/by-the-claw-satoshi-is-revealed
FBC