Is Stella Assange co-opted by Bitcoin "evangelist" scammers?
Author’s Note: I did not want to write this piece but it is painfully clear to me that again and again, Stella Assange, in absence of Julian Assange, all while Julian was still incarcerated from 2019 to 2024, has developed/gained a disturbing trust with pro-establishment Bitcoin figures who have used the Assange family and Julian’s name to promote Bitcoin into something far, far worse. In previous Substack articles, I have dubbed Bitcoin as “Zionist Bitcoin” because of the increasing presence of cryptocurrency’s biggest believers and staunch supporters these past several years have come from none other than the not so anonymous Zionist “whales”, mainly compromised of Wall Street billionaire-based capitalists, cypherpunks, and any dumb sucker such as scammer Max Keiser who invested into Bitcoin extremely early just a few years after Bitcoin was revealed to the public. And to think the development and release of Bitcoin all happened before and after the 2008 Market Collapse is no coincidence…
Is "Satoshi Nakamoto" cryonically frozen?
And so, it is without any regret nor shame that I publish this piece, point out some glaring observations, and ask whether Stella Assange has compromised free speech and independent journalism for digital $ in the form of ponzi. -Golden Monarch
Stella Assange and Bitcoin
Julian said #Bitcoin technology could defeat internet censorship. - Stella Assange 🙌
Stella Moris on her secret family with Julian Assange: ‘He’s unlike anyone I have ever met’
“Julian told me that #Bitcoin is the real Occupy Wall Street.” - Stella Assange 👏
Stella Assange, who previously went by Stella Moris, and before that Sara Gonzalez Devant, has advocated for her husband’s initial optimism of Bitcoin. Julian Assange, Wikileaks founder and journalist, once described in 2014 as the “most interesting thing on the Internet"; now it’s 2024. Would Julian still describe Bitcoin in the same way today as he did in 2014? Unknown, given Stella has been very vocal, speaking as if she speaks for Julian. Is Stella really being genuine here? No; much of the crypto establishment has re-quoted both Julian and Stella. Unless Stella has actually pushed back against the establishment narrative of Bitcoin (she hasn’t), then perhaps Stella has an ulterior motive for continuing to relate Bitcoin back to Julian/Wikileaks.
2022 NFT Opensea
Assange’s NFT Clock Sale Rides a Wave of DAO Crowdfunding
Why was DAOAssange getting into the business of NFT (Non-Fungible Token), a ponzi within a ponzi? Does Stella have direct involvement? Is Stella that naïve to trust a blockchain such as Ethereum, whose own inventor, Vitalik Buterin, has a hefty hand in funding the Ukraine proxy war?
If not Stella, then perhaps Gabriel Shipton, is who may need to be called out. Why would Gabriel trust a digital form of capitalism, where its tech opportunists all have extended their desired to extend blockchain technology including NFTs into mainstream. Did Stella and Gabriel not foresee the overly exaggerated promotion of NFTs would be a contributing factor as to why crypto fell off demand going into 2022? Even if crypto and NFT unrightfully have regained relevance due to the abundance of pro-establishment narrative regarding crypto, NFTs remain a pointless excuse to short promote a creation, pump it, and dump it once its use saw little value. BoredApe anyone?
Also, in 2021, was Gabriel fully aware of the implications of giving green light to supporting the NFT known as FreeRossDAO (based after Ross Ulbricht, creator of dark web marketplace known as Silk Road)? How does Gabriel confidently know Ulbricht is in the same league as his brother? One reported on exposing the truth (Julian), the other took advantage of exploiting selling narcotics and illegal services/products, which crypto back then was considered an example of (Ross). Politicians in the U.S., by script, have been pushing crypto propaganda heavily, ordered by their Zionist Wall Street lobbyists. Does Gabriel understand these are the same politicians and Western entities who went about wanting to bring his brother Julian into the U.S. to face trial?
Julian’s wife? Or Julian’s handler?
I chose freedom over justice, Julian Assange says in first comments after detention
Stella censors Julian...funny?
On October 1st, Julian spoke for the first time in many years. Julian called out the Trump administration including Mike Pompeo for how they treated Julian, and most importantly Julian’s personal decision to choose “freedom over justice”.
The Council of Europe recognized Julian was a political prisoner, and even held Britain to hold an inquiry as to whether Julian was exposed to inhuman treatment. Due to limited time, there was only so much Julian could speak about; he delivered the following statement below:
"I am free today after years of incarceration because I pleaded guilty to journalism, pleaded guilty to seeking information from a source, I pleaded guilty to obtaining information from a source and I pleaded guilty to informing the public what that information was" - Julian Assange
Later, when Julian jokingly referred to how he’s reacquainting with being a father to two children, a husband, and his mother-in-law (Stella’s mother), Stella appeared to mute Julian’s mic…all over a lighthearted joke. One can look at this as simply humor, but what if this wasn’t humor, and this was Stella mildly “controlling” what Julian was allowed to say about his family, let alone anything regarding politics? Hmm…
BTCPrague
From June 14, “The Success of Wikileaks cannot be separated from Bitcoin”…what is Stella even insinuating? Does the success of Wikileaks and the effort of #FreeAssange not come from the millions, if not billions of people worldwide who have all rallied together, putting pressure on their own governments to put pressure on the U.S. and the U.K. According to Stella, Bitcoin historian by the name of Pete Rizzo, described Julian as a “Bitcoin Legend”. But what Stella doesn’t mention about Rizzo is the fact of Rizzo being backed by pro-establishment Bitcoin Magazine as an editor and an Editor-at-Large involving the cryptocurrency exchange Kraken. And so when Stella explains her quote of success of Wikleaks and Bitcoin being inseparable, Stella suggests allies from across the political spectrum who would normally disagree on many things all came together, united when it came to Wikileaks, and that developers should care about activists. At first glance, this sounds genuine, given how Julian was resorted to seeking asylum and WikiLeaks’s reputation was constantly being surpassed. But, when discussion about regulation came about Bitcoin, Stella devises censorship would have been pushed through if Bitcoin was regulated; except the opposite has happened. Bitcoin hasn’t been properly regulated and yet the same advocates of Bitcoin especially of those from tech and political backgrounds have been the biggest culprits of enforcing censorship and authoritarianism (which already exists under the two-party system), especially over issues of Israel and Gaza. Why have the biggest advocates of Bitcoin (see Twitter) been openly pro-war and pro-censorship yet dead silent on reparations, universal healthcare, abolishing billionaires and the military? Hmm, oh Stella…
Stella scolds John Shipton appearance at BRICS summit
John Shipton proclaims non-Western nations world's 'centre of gravity'
Stella is apparently very critical of BRICS and its currently leadership, particularly with one leader named Vladimar Putin of Russia. Stella references Julian’s name to point out Julian would have been completely skeptical of BRICS and its affiliates own . Why is Stella tweeting as if she is Julian? What is Stella’s own opinion on the matter? Well, she follows deceased Alexey Navalny, oppositional candidate who ran against Putin, in which Ukrainian Azov leadership held Navalny in high regard. Does it make sense for Stella to be indirectly associated with someone who was highly likeable by both Ukraine and even the U.S.? And, why would Stella hold a distaste for Putin particularly when John personally thanked Putin for supporting his son Julian. Stella has fallen deaf for Western propaganda centering around Bitcoin…
Plan B Forum, featuring pro-establishment figures
Where is Julian? Why is Julian not present?
Plan B Lugano Forum, much like Bitcoin conferences hosted by pro-establishment Bitcoin Magazine, invited Stella, John, even Gabriel Shipton, Julian’s brother. Yet, Julian is missing entirely. And instead, Plan B is heavily surrounded by establishment figures such as Dennis Porter, Natalie Brunell, etc of whom could care less about Julian Assange personally, and only want to use the Assange name to promote more Bitcoin propaganda. Surely, Stella is well aware of this otherwise why has she continued to comfortably go to these conferences, whether to speak, or be a guest among many Bitcoin enthusiasts who are really all about keeping blockchain technology going in the form of ponzi scheme and capitalism. Bitcoin propaganda from the establishment hinder truth and independent journalism; why has censorship increased tenfold along with yet another massive transfer of wealth from Wall Street involving Ai, Web3, blockchain technology? This is not revolution; Stella’s actions pertaining to Bitcoin all seem to be one big “Honeypot Operation”.
What it took to free Julian! (UPDATE)
Last month (November 8), Plan B Lugano posted on its channel this clip of Stella, Gabriel, and John. And the moderator of this conversation was Brunell. Now, for some reason, the video is now “delisted” on Youtube. Why?
Disappointingly, Stella, Gabriel, and even John backed Bitcoin and its communities as being the vital tool that freed Julian. Gabriel referenced DAOAssange, John referenced BRICS and the banking blockade that previously prevented Wikileaks from receiving donations via fiat currency (and credit) whereas only Bitcoin was exempt, and Stella was perplexed on Donald J. Trump’s embrace of Bitcoin, even though Trump’s own administration made every attempt to threaten Julian’s well being.
There is more to the conversation, given how Brunell deceptively frames each question she asks to the Assange family. High recommendation to watch it while the video is still available.
Private jet
URGENT: Emergency appeal for donations to cover massive USD 520,000 debt for jet.
And probably the biggest question of all…who precisely donated nearly $500k in Bitcoin to pay off Julian’s private jet? On June 25, Stella tweeted an urgent announcement to anyone who could donate to cover Julian’s flight back to Australia. Two days later, June 27, Stella confirmed an anonymous Bitcoin donor managed to donate at least 8 Bitcoin worth, covering a bulk of the debt. Is it peculiarly interesting that the donation was deemed as an urgent emergency, and yet one person, out of the millions, if not billions of activists who for a decade have advocated for #FreeAssange, essentially cleared way for Julian to be freed. Was this donation announcement a setup, an opportunity for Stella to accumulate more Bitcoin? After all, Wikileaks has managed to sustain itself with its continuous acceptance of Bitcoin donations…what would Julian think about all this in the present?
Anonymous Bitcoiner who paid private flight might be…
Bitcoin Donor Exposed? Here’s Who Likely Sent $500,000 To Julian Assange
NEW: Someone just donated +8 #Bitcoin to cover Assange's $520,000 flight and recovery costs.
@BTCGandalf pic.twitter.com/Y9Qn2Lx9qj— Bitcoin Archive (@BTC_Archive) June 26, 2024
“Assange being free adds a burst of color to the grey hellscape of injustice currently plaguing the world. A stroke of bright blue sky. Maybe, everything will turn around.” - Andrew Tate
…and who is that person…?…the person(s) is not a good look for Stella because if either Andrew Tate or Jack Dorsey (former CEO of Twitter, CEO of Block, paid in Bitcoin to cover the bulk of Julian’s private jet, then more proof points out to Stella being heavily tied to the crypto establishment and its technocratic ponzi scheme, including Bitcoin.
What now for Julian (and Stella) Assange?
Julian is free (thank you #FreeAssange advocates) but at what cost? Was it merely for Wikileaks, being ordered to remove any previously DNC leaks per Chelsea Manning? No there has to be more; maybe Julian is omitted from speaking about his honest feelings specifically about the current direction that the crypto industry, financial institutions, and opportunists per capitalism are taking Bitcoin. Maybe Julian and by extension Wikileaks cannot per agreement go about debunking or challenge any Bitcoin/crypto/CBDC pro-establishment propaganda.
Whatever undisclosed agreement was reached besides settling for the $520k private jet, was it worth what Stella did, serving as a middle ground between her husband and the Bitcoin Zionists and their pro-establishment propaganda involving blockchain technology? Was it worth trading freedom of speech, & independent journalism for one of the successfully greatest ponzis of modern time? Only time will tell; only Julian Assange, and NOT Stella, can dismantle these “evangelist” scammers if and when he is ready to do so.
With that said,
#FreePalestine 🇵🇸 #FuckBitcoin
-Golden Monarch
F B C !!!